Bas Le Poole

Bas Le Poole is one of the two founding partners of Le Poole Bekema. He is a highly respected expert in his field and a committed and effective lawyer. Bas always aims to achieve the best possible solution for his clients.

Bas regularly litigates and advises his clients on commercial disputes. He specialises in cases concerning the media, intellectual property and unlawful competition. He has successfully litigated groundbreaking cases on both national and European level.

In addition Bas advises on the strategic and publicity issues surrounding a case. He has wide board experience including as chairman of Houthoff Buruma, one of the biggest Dutch law firms. Bas is a member of the Intellectual Property Advisory Board of the Dutch Bar Association.

For the last 20 years Bas has been rated in the highest category of the international legal directory Chambers Global and Legal 500. He is recognised for his “commitment, client-oriented approach and extensive knowledge“. Bas is the author of the book “Comparative Advertising”.

  • Commercial Law
  • Intellectual Property
  • Media
T +31 23 303 4643
M +31 6 226 90 460

Recent matters handled by Bas

Media / Intellectual Property

Bas Le Poole represents Rodap in proceedings concerning producers copyright against Lira, the collecting society representing screenwriters. Within Rodap the most important Dutch distributors, broadcasters and producers of (audio-)visual works have united. On 18 October 2016 the Amsterdam Court followed Rodap’s position that all copyrights which are necessary for the exploitation of a film work should be concentrated with the producers.


Media

Bas Le Poole successfully represented the Japanese multinational Terumo, manufacturer of injection needles and catheters, in proceedings against the Dutch broadcaster AVROTROS. AVROTROS made accusations against Terumo in several broadcasts of EenVandaag. In its verdict of 3 August 2016, the Court ruled that the accusations were unlawful and ordered AVROTROS to publish rectifications on television and on its website. In addition, the Court ruled that AVROTROS is liable for the damages incurred by Terumo which are a result of the unlawful broadcasts.